Texas v. Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW)

If it's caused by humans, we don't know.  I believe Texas is right, that right now, the IPCC and CRU have... well, screwed up big time.  Their study, undone.  An undergraduate would have received a D or worse as a grade.  Their data, who the hell knows how valid it is, they certainly don't.  Supposed facts found within the report, proven false.  It's pathetic.

I like what the AG wrote in his petition for reconsideration.  The whole foundation upon which the EPA decided to base its Endangerment Finding is crumbling.  The lead on the project, Phil Jones, a Brit, was obviously biased and is at the heart of the bungle.  He really wanted to prove AGW, because I think he really believe it to be true.  So, he sort of let the ends dictate the means to a degree.  He wanted to reach that end, and quickly.  So, instead of doing purely professional work to find out the truth of whether there is AGW, he sought to prove AGW.  Even in recent interviews, he still shows that bias.  He doesn't care about objective truth, he just wants to serve his own selfish interests.  He even talked about suicide, and those are the most selfish types of all.

So yeah, it's all bunk, start over, verify original data from monitors that don't change locations... you know, the basics.  If you can't get the basics right, just give up and let someone else do it, stop wasting our time because if there really is AGW, we need to know sooner than later...  you dumbasses at IPCC and CRU.